The Progressive Post

The EU Referendum and Why China is Concerned About It

15/11/2015

For the Chinese media, President Xi’s forthcoming visit to Britain is the biggest concern, but for serious observers in China, the focus is still the “Exit Referendum”.

While most Chinese people are excited about the invitation sent by the Queen to Mr. Xi and his wife to a reception at Buckingham Palace, I regard this visit as determining for the joint fate of Britain and EU. Understandably, most Chinese observers do not think that Britain will eventually “exit” from EU, even if they recognize that the results of referenda are full of unknowns. The reasons are, firstly, that Chinese observers believe that a more favorable choice for Britain is to stay in the EU because of the huge economic interests. The UK would otherwise have to bear huge losses. This “economic interest analysis” is the main perspective that most Chinese analysts prefer to apply when they make judgments on international affairs, which relating to China’s development experience and understanding of its relations with the world. Second, they also believe that Mr. Cameron is not willing to be the leader of a country that lost its EU membership, just as he would not like to take the responsibility for the loss of Scotland. Thus, his government and party will do everything in their power to prevent a withdrawal. The third reason is that the Chinese are unfamiliar with referenda, and it is not regarded as a reliable and solemn way of political decision-making. It gives the impression that the government runs away from its responsibilities, while giving opportunities to populists. As an analogy, the “political risk” in the Scottish referendum is often to describe the uncertainty of the referendum itself and the huge “waste” of political resources. Last but not least, most Chinese observers have a positive attitude towards European integration and its product, EU, and tend to see a united Europe, not a divided one. “To support European integration” is not only Chinese government official rhetoric. This could be attributed to the EU’s achievements in resolving regional peace and development issues and its external image as a “soft power”. Naturally, those supporters of European integration are not willing to see the unexpected or reversed situation, any “exit” situation, whether it happens in Greece or Britain,. The main reason for China’s concern about the referendum is that the results will impact China-Britain and China-EU relations greatly, especially if British people say “no” to EU. China has huge economic interests in Britain and looks forward to more cooperation with this important economic and trade partner in Europe. Moreover, it is also an European matter, as if British people choose to leave the EU, China will take time to assess the impact and make sense of the new model of relationship between Britain and EU. No matter which model is chosen, China would have to adjust its policy vis-à-vis Britain based on the results of its assessment. Since there is no “regulation” from Brussels, the two sides can get more space and potential for their cooperation in various fields (finance, energy, green economy and infrastructure). But as a price, China’s expectation that a “market liberal” Britain can play a more positive and leading role within EU may fall. When the United States had a hostile positioning and other European countries hesitated, Britain became the first western economy to join the AIIB, which has won a good impression from China. China is naturally hoping that Britain will become a “strong supporter” of China in the West as Prime Minister Mr. Cameron claimed during his visit. If Britain is out of the EU, its pragmatic and positive policy towards China will have less “demonstration effect” to other EU countries, and this is not what China would like to see.

 

Find all related publications
Publications
18/04/2024

The transformation of the mainstream right and its impact on (social) democracy

15/04/2024

Expected labour market effects of the Green Deal Industrial Plan

The potential of labour policy for Just Transition regions
15/04/2024

Labour migration in the Western Balkans

Balkan Focus series
05/03/2024

A European feminist foreign policy?

The need for a progressive and transformative approach
Find all related news
News
19/04/2024

FEPS welcomes the signing of the La Hulpe Declaration

05/04/2024

FEPS supports the declaration of Portimão calling for affordable housing in the EU

Affordable housing needs Europe, Europe needs affordable housing
05/04/2024

FEPS stands with Zita Gurmai against persecution from Orban regime

02/04/2024

Interview with Maria João Rodrigues on the need for EU treaty changes with Euronews

Find all related in the media
In the media

Karl Polanyi against the ‘free market’ dystopia

by Social Europe 23/04/2024
In this article published in Social Europe, FEPS Secretary General László Andor reassess the Hungarian social scientist’s legacy.

Jetzt oder nie: Österreichs digitales Schicksal entscheidet sich (auch) im Klassenzimmer!

by Börse Express 14/04/2024
'Now or never: Austria's digital fate will (also) be decided in the classroom!' Börse Express's article mentions FEPS policy brief 'Europe needs high-tech talent'

EU-VÍZIÓ, Dull Szabolcs újságíró Andor Lászlóval beszélget

by MÚOSZ Magyar Újságírók Országos Szövetsége 11/04/2024
On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the EU great Eastern enlargement, FEPS Secretary General László Andor talks, in this video interview to the Hungarian Journalists' Association, the functioning of the Commission and its further development.

Sustainable democracies need a sustainable media sector, says Jourová

by EURACTIV 02/04/2024
FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues discusses AI and journalism at Stars4Media event